LeetCode 2711 - Difference of Number of Distinct Values on Diagonals
The problem is asking us to compute a new matrix answer based on a given m x n grid, where each cell in answer represents the absolute difference between the number of distinct elements on the diagonal above and to the left of the current cell, and the number of distinct…
Difficulty: 🟡 Medium
Topics: Array, Hash Table, Matrix
Solution
Problem Understanding
The problem is asking us to compute a new matrix answer based on a given m x n grid, where each cell in answer represents the absolute difference between the number of distinct elements on the diagonal above and to the left of the current cell, and the number of distinct elements on the diagonal below and to the right. Specifically, for a cell (r, c) in grid, leftAbove[r][c] counts all distinct values along the diagonal starting from cells in the top-left direction (not including (r, c)), and rightBelow[r][c] counts all distinct values along the diagonal extending to the bottom-right direction (again excluding (r, c)).
The input grid can be as small as 1 x 1 or as large as 50 x 50, and the cell values are guaranteed to be positive integers up to 50. The small constraint on m and n suggests that solutions with quadratic complexity in terms of the total number of cells are feasible.
Important edge cases include a grid with a single element, grids where all elements are identical, and grids with varying diagonal lengths. The problem guarantees a rectangular matrix with at least one row and column.
Approaches
Brute Force
A brute-force approach would iterate over every cell (r, c) and explicitly collect all distinct values along its top-left diagonal for leftAbove and along its bottom-right diagonal for rightBelow. For each cell, this requires scanning up to min(m, n) cells in each diagonal direction. While this would produce the correct result, the time complexity is high: for each of the m x n cells, we may iterate up to O(min(m, n)) elements twice. For a 50 x 50 grid, this is feasible but inefficient, with complexity roughly O(m * n * min(m, n)).
Optimal Approach
The key observation is that all cells along a diagonal share the same diagonal index d = r - c. Using this, we can traverse each diagonal from top-left to bottom-right once, maintaining a running set of distinct elements encountered so far for leftAbove, and then traverse in reverse for rightBelow. This allows computing distinct counts for all cells in a diagonal in linear time relative to the diagonal length, reducing redundant work.
| Approach | Time Complexity | Space Complexity | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brute Force | O(m * n * min(m, n)) | O(min(m, n)) | Scans diagonals for every cell independently |
| Optimal | O(m * n) | O(m + n) | Uses hash sets per diagonal and two linear passes |
Algorithm Walkthrough
- Compute
leftAbovematrix: iterate over each diagonal identified byr - c. For each diagonal, traverse cells from top-left to bottom-right, maintaining a setseenof elements encountered so far. For each cell, store the size ofseeninleftAbove[r][c]and then add the current element toseen. - Compute
rightBelowmatrix: iterate over each diagonal again but traverse from bottom-right to top-left. Maintain a separate setseenfor the diagonal and updaterightBelow[r][c]similarly, storing the number of distinct elements seen so far before adding the current element. - Construct the
answermatrix by taking the absolute difference betweenleftAbove[r][c]andrightBelow[r][c]for every cell.
Why it works: Each diagonal is uniquely identified by r - c, ensuring that every element along the diagonal is considered exactly once. By traversing in two directions, we separate the "leftAbove" and "rightBelow" contributions correctly. Using sets ensures only distinct elements are counted, matching the problem requirements.
Python Solution
from typing import List
class Solution:
def differenceOfDistinctValues(self, grid: List[List[int]]) -> List[List[int]]:
m, n = len(grid), len(grid[0])
leftAbove = [[0] * n for _ in range(m)]
rightBelow = [[0] * n for _ in range(m)]
# Compute leftAbove
diagonals = {}
for r in range(m):
for c in range(n):
d = r - c
if d not in diagonals:
diagonals[d] = set()
leftAbove[r][c] = len(diagonals[d])
diagonals[d].add(grid[r][c])
# Compute rightBelow
diagonals.clear()
for r in reversed(range(m)):
for c in reversed(range(n)):
d = r - c
if d not in diagonals:
diagonals[d] = set()
rightBelow[r][c] = len(diagonals[d])
diagonals[d].add(grid[r][c])
# Construct answer
answer = [[abs(leftAbove[r][c] - rightBelow[r][c]) for c in range(n)] for r in range(m)]
return answer
This solution first initializes leftAbove and rightBelow matrices. It iterates diagonally by using the key r - c and uses sets to track distinct elements. Finally, it constructs the result using element-wise absolute differences.
Go Solution
func differenceOfDistinctValues(grid [][]int) [][]int {
m, n := len(grid), len(grid[0])
leftAbove := make([][]int, m)
rightBelow := make([][]int, m)
for i := 0; i < m; i++ {
leftAbove[i] = make([]int, n)
rightBelow[i] = make([]int, n)
}
diagonals := map[int]map[int]bool{}
// Compute leftAbove
for r := 0; r < m; r++ {
for c := 0; c < n; c++ {
d := r - c
if diagonals[d] == nil {
diagonals[d] = make(map[int]bool)
}
leftAbove[r][c] = len(diagonals[d])
diagonals[d][grid[r][c]] = true
}
}
// Compute rightBelow
diagonals = map[int]map[int]bool{}
for r := m - 1; r >= 0; r-- {
for c := n - 1; c >= 0; c-- {
d := r - c
if diagonals[d] == nil {
diagonals[d] = make(map[int]bool)
}
rightBelow[r][c] = len(diagonals[d])
diagonals[d][grid[r][c]] = true
}
}
// Construct answer
answer := make([][]int, m)
for r := 0; r < m; r++ {
answer[r] = make([]int, n)
for c := 0; c < n; c++ {
diff := leftAbove[r][c] - rightBelow[r][c]
if diff < 0 {
diff = -diff
}
answer[r][c] = diff
}
}
return answer
}
In Go, we use maps to simulate sets for tracking distinct elements on each diagonal. The reversed iteration handles the bottom-right calculation, and absolute differences are computed manually.
Worked Examples
Example 1: grid = [[1,2,3],[3,1,5],[3,2,1]]
Step 1: Compute leftAbove
Diagonal keys r - c:
d=0-> (0,0),(1,1),(2,2)d=-1-> (0,1),(1,2)d=-2-> (0,2)d=1-> (1,0),(2,1)d=2-> (2,0)
Tracking sets along each diagonal:
| Cell | leftAbove set | Count |
|---|---|---|
| (0,0) | {} | 0 |
| (1,1) | {1} | 1 |
| (2,2) | {1,1} -> {1} | 1 |
| (0,1) | {} | 0 |
| (1,2) | {3} | 1 |
| (0,2) | {} | 0 |
| (1,0) | {} | 0 |
| (2,1) | {3} | 1 |
| (2,0) | {} | 0 |
Step 2: Compute rightBelow (reverse traversal along diagonals)
- Similarly, compute counts for each cell.
Step 3: Compute answer
- answer[r][c] = |leftAbove[r][c] - rightBelow[r][c]|
Final matrix: [[1,1,0],[1,0,1],[0,1,1]]
Example 2: grid = [[1]]
- Single element, no diagonals exist.
- leftAbove = [[0]], rightBelow = [[0]], answer = [[0]]
Complexity Analysis
| Measure | Complexity | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Time | O(m * n) | Each cell is visited twice, once for leftAbove and once for rightBelow, with constant-time set operations for at most 50 elements |
| Space | O(m + n) | Sets per diagonal, at most one set per diagonal, |